Skip to content

Use case

Change code knowing what it touches

Coding and data-engineering agents see what a column means, what depends on it and what a change will break — across legacy and modern systems.

The situation

Coding agents now write and change the pipelines that produce your numbers. They read the file in front of them well. What they cannot see is everything around it: what a column means to the business, which reports and downstream jobs depend on it, and whether the same logic also lives in a program three systems away. An agent that changes code without that context ships a breaking change with full confidence.

What Semantic Scout does about it

Context your agents can query

Coding and data-engineering agents reach the same lineage and meaning your people do, directly over MCP and A2A, with the evidence attached. Any agent that speaks MCP can use it.

Impact before the change

Column-level lineage across legacy and modern systems shows what a change touches — reports, downstream jobs, the regulatory figure at the end of the chain — before it ships, not after it breaks.

Meaning that matches the code

Descriptions derived from the code itself rather than from documentation nobody updated, so the agent works from what the system actually does.

Evidence a reviewer can check

Every fact an agent relies on cites the file and line behind it, so a reviewer can check the agent’s reasoning instead of taking it on trust.

Proof

In production use at Nordic enterprises in banking and telecom. Our own chat over transformations is an agent grounded in the same context, working on the hardest estate there is.

“Auto generated descriptions for the data assets are so rich, better than human-written ones.”
Data Scientist · Telecom

Customer names are withheld by agreement. Roles and industries are accurate.

Give your agents something to stand on

See what evidence-backed context looks like against your own repositories, rather than a vendor sandbox.